Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Belton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep, bad faith nomination by banned user: see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/DogJesterExtra. Part Deux 21:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Mark Belton[edit]
Seems like fancruft. Also no verifiable sources for titles won Aqua Nation 01:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 01:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete sportcruft. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:BIO for sportspeople due to lack of reliable sources. MER-C 08:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - He has a number of hits on google. However, the page has stayed in the same shape since my last edits with no indication of exspantion and as i dont really know enough about him or have the time to expand it, i guess it should go. -- Paulley
- Keep This is about a wrestler and although its a small article, sometimes small articles are the best - remember its quality not quantity!! Tellyaddict 16:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This isnt just small.. its a stub.. with little to no info and no much in the way of references or notabillity. --- Paulley
- Delete Non notableDogJesterExtra 16:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please note that creator is under investigation for being a WP:SOCK account of User:JB196 and if proven, the AFD will be Speedily deleted as a Keep (with no prejudice against renomination) See section on WP:AN/I for more details. SirFozzie 20:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable actor/sportsman. Sdedeo (tips) 21:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. Brainsynth 21:38, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.